Todd Wood draws our attention towards an interesting letter that was published in the latest CRSQ. I quote:
A couple issues back, CRSQ published an article by Bill Johnson titled “Biogeography: a creationist perspective,” in which the author failed to cite a number of pertinent creationist writings on biogeography but nevertheless lamented that “creationists have largely remained silent on the issue.” In general, I found the article to be poorly written, overly basic, but especially unhelpful because Johnson seemed to be unaware of what creationists had actually written on biogeography.
In the newest issue a letter from Carl Froede is published writing that many creationists have already elaborated on biogeography and that this article is not new, but overlooked a substantial amount of creationist papers about this subject.
My opinion is not really relevant, because I never published anything, but I have seen more articles that just did not investigate already published work.
It’s scientific misconduct and should not be done.
This is something that creationists should always remember!